On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 06:47:47AM -0800, avox wrote : > > > > Aurelien Roux wrote: > > > > Le Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:29:22AM -0800, avox a ?crit : > >> > >> > the > bitmap data. Any PDF renderer must make sure that the bitmap data is scaled > to cover that area. > > Printer agencies usually specify a minimum resolution to avoid ugly raster > effects > when the document is printed at high resolution. If you upsample your images > from 150dpi to 300dpi manually the result shouldn't be the better as if you > embed > the images at 150dpi in the first place (unless the print agency does some > really > strange stuff with your PDF).
OK, that's the way I've proceeded till the bug I've reported yesterday. > I guess they just said 300dpi because you loose quality if you have less and > you dont > gain much quality if you provide a higher resolution (just wasting memory). > > So your approach will likely produce some rasterisation effects in the final > print. > If you want to check beforehand, you can print a section (eg. one of the > persons) > in original size on an A4 color printer and look at it from a distance. It's fine, I already printed one at the real size, and it was fine. So no matter. Just hope they won't be problems at the agency > > /Andreas > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Transparent-tif-bug-and-related-thoughts-tf3326142.html#a9250873 > Sent from the Scribus mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Scribus mailing list > Scribus at nashi.altmuehlnet.de > http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/mailman/listinfo/scribus -- ============================== ORL (alias Yvette H.)
