On 3/15/07, Gregory Pittman <gpittman at iglou.com> wrote: > I think there is a decided asymmetry of content. Something like the > relationship between TIFF and JPEG. HTML is an imprecise, relative > format that adjusts to its environment, while Scribus defines a strict > environment, with high precision. So going from Scribus to HTML is > feasible, though certainly requiring some significant work. Going from > HTML to Scribus creates many problems, just like going from JPEG to TIFF > would.
I'm not clear why this would be, if you actually treat HTML as the markup language it is, and didn't try to use it for layout. HTML was only ever meant to give a document structure, not design -- that's what CSS is for. Scribus should have no difficulty with structured documents. Granted, there are an awful lot of folks who can't wrap their heads around this concept, but I don't feel any obligation to plan around them. -- Steve Herrick Que si las manos son nuestras Es nuestro lo que nos den - Victor Jara
