On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:04:26 +0200, Christoph Sch?fer wrote: > The communication could have been better, and IMHO it hasn't been stated > clearly enough that 1.3.4 is a development version. On the other hand, if > you go to www.scribus.net, you'll see that 1.3.3.9 is described as the > latest stable version, not 1.3.4.
Much of the confusing is comming from the difficult naming scheme for version numbers that the Scribus team has choosen. If 1.3.3.5 would have been 1.4 it would have been clear to everyone that this is the stable version. Development could have happend on 1.5.x then. Next stable 1.6 or 2.0 a.s.o. Regards, Helge
