Louis Desjardins wrote: > John Beardmore a ?crit : >> David Christian Berg wrote: >>> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 08:58 -0400, Gregory Pittman wrote:
>>>> Actually, you'll want an older version for fewer annoyances: 1.3.3.9 >>> I guess, that just depends on the kind of annoyances. And for my kind of >>> annoyances, I assume I have less in the development version (e.g. I >>> don't really mind, that Scribus crashes every time I close a document). >>> I used the 1.3.3 cycle a long time ago but the 1.3.4 version works a lot >>> better for me. >>> And if I'm not mistaken, the format of 1.3.3 is not compatible with >>> 1.3.4 and vice versa. hence switching would mean loosing my data. >> >> Surely the intent would be that 1.3.4.x would read 1.3.3.x files, though >> not the other way around ? If not, that really will be a pain ! > > AFAIK, the newest releases can always read older files done in previous > versions. I've never tried tried it, but my understanding is that InDesign 2.x won't read files from 1.x ! :) Indeed this was one of the stupidities that led us to investigate Scribus. > AFAIK, this has been like that for a long time now. I hope so. Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore, MSc EDM (Open), B.A. Chem (Oxon), CMIOSH, AIEMA, MEI. Managing Director, T4 Sustainability Limited. http://www.T4sLtd.co.uk/ Carbon Trust Consultant - Energy Audit and Design Advice. Energy Efficiency Accreditation Scheme Registered Assessor. P:0845 4561332 F:0870 0522417 M:07785 563116 Skype:t4sustainability
