m8130 at abc.se wrote: >> I guess, but with most pictures being a few meg, and most LANs being >> 100mbps, I can't get excited about the network traffic. All this > > What is wrong with the old fashioned way? To copy the image manually to > your working directory?
There's nothing wrong with any way. > Ok, I can agree that it wouldn't be to hard to let Scribus do the copying, > but I think it must be an option that can be turned off for people who > already in their workflow do the copying. Agreed. > Also, I think most people working in a network environment will store the > Scribus documents on the network, that would mean that Scribus would copy > the file from one network location to another, but still have to fetch the > images over the network. I don't know about that. Some of mine live on the laptop, others on the servers or desktop machines. It probably won't be long before some of us start using it over a WAN because the image library is stored in one location. These things will vary from case to case. Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore, MSc EDM (Open), B.A. Chem (Oxon), CMIOSH, AIEMA, MEI. Managing Director, T4 Sustainability Limited. http://www.T4sLtd.co.uk/ Carbon Trust Consultant - Energy Audit and Design Advice. Energy Efficiency Accreditation Scheme Registered Assessor. P:0845 4561332 F:0870 0522417 M:07785 563116 Skype:t4sustainability
