2008/2/23, Peter Nermander <peter.nermander at abc.se>: > > > If someone hand me a 3-fold pamphlet letter size and wants me to print > > 50.000 copies of it on a larger press, I will not be happy to receive > this > > work in 6 parts (3 pages for the front, 3 pages for the back), and then > > reassemble it *before* actually imposing it 8 up to print on a larger > > sheet. > > > So, if someone wants you to print a book, you want them to bring you a > file containing complete signatures? Not a file with single pages in > consecutive order?
More seriously, I wonder why you ask a question and give the answer at the same time? I wonder about the tone of your question (seems more like an affirmation than a question). Provided your knowledge of printing and the explanations you gave earlier in this thread, I am afraid this last comment (question?) of yours is not really constructive. You are completely wrong trying to distort what I say and come up with a conclusion you know is wrong. By doing so, not only do you introduce noise on this list, but you're mixing things up. Again, nothing constructive here, imsho. Organising the 6 panels (3 for each page) of a pamphlet is lay-out, not imposition. We're trying to help people deal with a feature that is at least questionnable. We're talking ? and you know that perfectly ? about panels of a pamphlet, which are no different than columns of a page (magazine, newspaper, etc.). It is a mistake to associate those panels to pages of a book. It is simply not the case. Quite different, in fact. A letter-size pamphlet is a 2-page document. No matter if you fold it in Z-shape or U-shape. The 6 panels are not six pages ? at least from the printing point of view. Don't mix things up. Don't let people think it could be otherwise with such misleading affirmation (sorry, question). Louis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20080224/889aa08d/attachment.htm
