Am Mittwoch, 26. M?rz 2008 00:39:50 schrieb Owen: > > Hi all, > > > > I know this has been discussed here recently, but again: > > When I started a 40-page publishing project last summer, > > I wanted to have bleed settings. I got very well along > > by simply doing everything with (then stable) 1.3.3.9 > > After everything except bleed settings was done, I imported > > the whole thing into 1.3.4, added the bleed settings > > and was happy. Would this still be the way to go, > > except, of course, that it's 1.3.3.11 now? > > > > Serious problems lay elsewhere last time: > > My document got screwed up, partly due to bad > > PS/PDF from external sources (will know to avoid > > this now), but partly the .sla structure was > > obviously corrupted. > > (I helped it by creating partial documents and > > assembling the resulting PDFs with other tools.) > > From the changelog, it looks like _tons_ of bugs > > have been shaken out between 1.3.3.9 and 1.3.3.11, > > so what's your overall experience in stability > > and document integrity now? > > > > That said, I would just like to thank the developers for > > there work -- it's great software! > > > > Thanks, Martin > > Would this be relevant to your problem? > > > > http://wiki.scribus.net/index.php/Bleed%2C_create_markers_and_export_a_docu >ment_to_pdf >
And just for the record: If an encoding issue can be fixed, this script will be part of Scribus 1.3.3.12 :) Christoph
