>> >> For a start, having a text-only-editor would be great. >> > the .sla file format is changing towards xml conformitiy. in this > context, it is planned to make external text sources possible. > > > it's not on the highest priority, but afaik it will happen. > > > ... and with a bit of luck we will get a new .sla which is an archive > (zip, tar) of xml files...
Curious - will that be optional or enforced? i.e. when I add a photo it is basically enforced - there is no way to import a photo into the sla file its self. When I add a text document I might do that using import, or by cut'n'paste or by free typing. The reason I ask is if I share those files back - they would need to (a) all be there (b) be named logically. If I import a document then the naming could follow, But cut'n'paste or free type would likely just be named Text1234 - which means expecting someone to make edits on the file is tricky...
