michael crane wrote: >> What I am starting to find doing energy audits etc is that the better >> resolution images capture things that the human eye might have missed at the >> time. > > there was a youtube thing where a guy in a gorilla outfit walked > through camera and nobody notices but i forget where I saw it. > mick
Yes - also interesting that on a lot of historic photographs on big negatives, the background trivia record a lot of social history material at decent resolution. I guess we all got used to 35mm because the cameras were compact and the images were good enough. I'm looking forward to a point though where the cameras are still the same sort of size, but the resolution is much better than 35mm ever was. Fingers crossed, though subjectively I think we may be getting there. I get the impression that my current 10 megapixel camera has better resolution than 35mm film, certainly at 400 ASA. In some modes (which are admittedly lower resolution), it has much better light sensitivity than 400 ASA too. It's all getting quite impressive, though the user interfaces could do with being less extrovert and more informative I guess. Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore, MSc EDM (Open), B.A. Chem (Oxon), CMIOSH, AIEMA, MEI Managing Director, T4 Sustainability Limited. http://www.T4sLtd.co.uk/ Energy Audit, Carbon Management, Design Advice, Sustainable Energy Consultancy and Installation, Carbon Trust Standard Registered Assessor Phone: 0845 4561332 Mobile: 07785 563116 Skype: t4sustainability
