wayne wrote: > Is the 1.3.5 version adequate for > business use? If not, why not? What specifically would be the problem?
'Which bugs haven't you found yet' is seldom an easy question for developers to answer. Presumably few bugs are know which is why it's an RC, but it hasn't been tested much which is why it shouldn't be regarded as a stable release. It very probably will be fine for many business applications, but without more testing I guess developers know it would be unwise to encourage you to depend on it for anything that would take a long tome to do again in 1.3.3.13 or whatever. My gut feeling for what it's worth, is that I might used it for two sided flyers for friends of the family, but I wouldn't yet use it for serious technical documentation with money, deadlines and reputation on the line. Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore, MSc EDM (Open), B.A. Chem (Oxon), CMIOSH, AIEMA, MEI Managing Director, T4 Sustainability Limited. http://www.T4sLtd.co.uk/ Energy Audit, Carbon Management, Design Advice, Sustainable Energy Consultancy and Installation, Carbon Trust Standard Registered Assessor Phone: 0845 4561332 Mobile: 07785 563116 Skype: t4sustainability
