Gee, I don't see why this fellow felt the need to slam Scribus in a public forum. "Different strokes..." and all that; he can use anything he likes. I used QuarkXpress for many years, switched to Scribus in revolt against the almost annual $300 upgrade charge, cooperated with the learning curve rather than fought it, and I'm extremely pleased with the results, use Scribus for all dtp publishing that I do. I put together newsletters and church bulletin covers, send work to printers, and can do everything I used to use Quark for. Sure, there's some differences, but so what? Quark is very good if a person can afford it, I suspect it works better on a Mac but I'm a Windows & Linux person. The upgrades on Scribus are free, so far its not become clunky with trying to do too much. What's not to like? Just remember the good old days of working in WordStar in DOS and making a text change, having to reformat the entire document line by line every time.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Michael F. Chamness 618 - 2nd Street Montpelier, North Dakota 58472 (701) 489-3638 On 6/17/2010 5:00 AM, scribus-request at lists.scribus.info wrote: > From: Jos? Antonio Rocha<joseantoniorocha at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [scribus] Scribus
