On Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:15:08 -0800, Marie-No?lle Augendre <mnaugendre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> Hi Marie-Noelle, >> >> My intention was to provide a suggestion, not criticize, If that was my >> book I would have known where the image was just by looking at it and >> realizing where in the book it was located. >> >> take care >> >> keith >> >> -- >> >> > I wasn't criticizing either, just providing information (sorry if my > English > is not as polished as I'd liked it too be). > It's always interessant to get different opinions, even if some of them > don't apply to one's specific case. > > You always know where each photo is in the book? Look at this one: > http://fr.blurb.com/bookstore/invited/1289545/2e41ecf40d75613bcaeb79e2e372ba63 > Though it has less than 40 pages, I'm totally unable to find a specific > photo in the book unless I have its filename. > ;-) > > Marie-No?lle > Hello Marie-Noelle, If it was MY book I would know where the photo was located by looking at it. I start cataloguing my photos when they come off the camera. I want to avoid having to frustrate myself trying to locate an image, especially if it is one I am using. Prepare your images and your text before it gets into Scribus. In the long run it saves time. Could look something like this: > My-Book>Chapter1>chapter1-images/ >chapter1-text/ >chapter2-images/ If the image is important, make a copy, catalogue it in the same manner as you catalogue the original. If I end up spending time trying to find the location of an image I am using I have taken the flow out of workflow and only the work is left. keith > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
