Well, it looks like the general opinion is to keep things as they are. So I retract my suggestion. And who knows, I might learn something after all!
Jos? On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Behrens, Lars (PHI) <Lars.Behrens at kit.edu>wrote: > Am 06.12.2012 08:56, schrieb Sveinn ? Felli: > > In other words, I like the complexity here, and would hate to see it go. >>> >>> >> Also, it gives a sort of confidence knowing that developers >> and/or dev-capables are lurking around the user-list ;-) >> >> USER is a broad definition, as pointed out by Greg. >> Occasionally there have been discussions about limiting the >> mailinglist to strictly Scribus-related subjects (as opposed >> to general DTP questions) but even without strict rules so >> far we've managed to stay mostly on topic(s). >> Personally I like the multitude of different topics brought >> up here, even though some of them don't fit into my areas of >> interest. If we were talking about hundreds of posts daily, >> that would be different. >> > > Yes fully ack from my point of view. I often can learn something from a > topic which at first seemed to "basic" or "elaborate" for me. > > So I would vote for keeping the list as it is. > > Cheerz, > Lars > > > ___ > Scribus Mailing List: scribus at lists.scribus.net > Edit your options or unsubscribe: > http://lists.scribus.net/**mailman/listinfo/scribus<http://lists.scribus.net/mailman/listinfo/scribus> > See also: > http://wiki.scribus.net > http://forums.scribus.net > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.scribus.net/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20121206/78d0a7c6/attachment.html>
