2012/1/11 ale rimoldi <ale.comp_06 at xox.ch> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:33:06 -0500 > Gregory Pittman <gregp_ky at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On 01/10/2012 09:27 AM, Gregory Pittman wrote: > > > > > > > > What I meant was that, even with some sort of anchoring mechanism, I > > > think you will likely need to tweak anyway. Most of us (I think) are > > > very particular about the appearance and positioning of the graphics > > > relative to text, so I just tried to envision how I might get some > > > automated way to maintain that, and I can't envision that I would be > > > satisfied. > > > > > > > I've tried out this inline graphics concept, and to me it's very > > unsatisfactory for any sizeable image. There is no way to manage text > > flow except manually. > > indeed, i also think that inline images are thought for small images > you would put in your text as if they where glyphs... > > afaict, cezary is working on anchors amongs frames, so it may well be > that in the near future we will have a way to "dynamically" place > images. > > a "dangerous" think as greg says, but if you use it well, it can be a > wonderful feature! >
Imagine a catalog, with dozens of images surrounded with descriptive text with a rather complex formatting (headers, subheaders, description, value, etc). You'd want eveything to move at once, text and images, when you insert a new entry ? provided the layout is structured in a way that all entries are based on the same model. That would be wonderful, yes! Louis > > ciao > a.l.e > > ___ > Scribus Mailing List: scribus at lists.scribus.net > Edit your options or unsubscribe: > http://lists.scribus.net/mailman/listinfo/scribus > See also: > http://wiki.scribus.net > http://forums.scribus.net > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.scribus.net/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20120111/27fbb0b4/attachment.html>
