On 06/08/2012 08:58 AM, Olivier BERTEN wrote: > Not at all. According to the OpenType specs > <http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_pt.htm#tnum>, the > Tabular figures (tnum) feature "will generally be the default, but > this cannot be safely assumed." > > More on numerical styles > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms745109.aspx#numerical_styles >
But in some respects it seems that this is creating a monospaced (called tabular) effect with a proportional glyph. From the first reference: "Replaces figure glyphs set on proportional widths with corresponding glyphs set on uniform (tabular) widths. Tabular widths will generally be the default, but this cannot be safely assumed. Of course this feature would not be present in monospaced designs." Greg
