On 10 Dec 2013, at 9:19, Peter Nermander <peter at nermander.se> wrote: >> Why is that important? Shouldn't Scribus follow standard Linux practice >> by setting the permissions to the same as the directory they're in? > > Yes, Scribus should. But is doesn't. > > As I understand it: > > Directory har permissions 755 > The .sla gets permissions 644 > All images and fonts get permissions 600 > > THAT is the problem. The images and fonts should become 644 just like the > .sla. > I agree that Scribus should maintain ownership settings on files however the idea that it should change permissions on files based on the parent directory permissions is false. There's no standard saying that a directory's settings must determine the file settings at all, anywhere on any OS . Craig
- [scribus] collecting for outp... ZASKE Martin
- [scribus] collecting for outp... JLuc
- [scribus] collecting for outp... Joe Zeff
- [scribus] collecting for outp... ZASKE Martin
- [scribus] collecting for outp... Rolf-Werner Eilert
- [scribus] collecting for outp... Rolf-Werner Eilert
- [scribus] collecting for outp... Rolf-Werner Eilert
- [scribus] collecting for outp... Rolf-Werner Eilert
- [scribus] collecting for outp... ZASKE Martin
- [scribus] collecting for output Peter Nermander
- [scribus] collecting for output Craig Bradney
- [scribus] collecting for output JLuc
- [scribus] collecting for output Craig Bradney
- [scribus] collecting for output Gregory Pittman
- [scribus] collecting for output ZASKE Martin
- [scribus] collecting for output Sveinn í Felli
- [scribus] collecting for output ZASKE Martin
- [scribus] collecting for output Joe Zeff
- [scribus] collecting for output Craig Bradney
- [scribus] collecting for output Mark Heieis
- [scribus] collecting for output Craig Bradney
