Le 11/12/2015 08:57, Chris Bannister a ?crit : > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:46:23PM -0500, John Culleton wrote: >> >> The version 1.5.0 is effectively a released >> version. It is available for download without >> visiting the svn file. I think the Scribus team >> would be doing users a service if they simply >> marked 1.5.0 as "stable" which it is, or at >> least as stable as the "stable" 1.4.3 version. > > Are you using unstable in the sense as 1) constantly changing or 2) > likely to crash?
With 'unstable' I mean likely to not provide the expected behaviour crashing being part of it. > Distributions use the term as in sense 1). > For distro maintainers and sysadmins, "stable" has everything to do with > maintaining a consistant platform over an extended period of time. It seems that Qt5 use for scribus 1.5 seems to be an issue for some distros but I suggest these distros should labeled as unstable rather than scribus1.5 if unstable qualifies platform consistancy ability ;-) JL
