On Wed, 16 May 2001 18:31:24 -0500, G. Wade Johnson said:
> > No. Test is just too generic. HTTP makes more sense, or perhaps something
> > related to the fact that it is a multi-protocol thingy - perhaps it should go
> > in the alread-existing Networking category. Things should be categorized by
> > useful categories, not huge amorphous ones.
> >
> > WRT multi-file scripts, no, that does not work yet.
..
>
> In defense of my suggestion, I was thinking of paralleling the
> Test::Harness Perl module, or something.
>
> Any other comments?
My opinions are just my opinions, and don't necessarily reflect the official
position of "the scripts committee". Kurt would be the final word on this.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReefKnot - http://www.reefknot.org
