Ah! I see... Mmmh, the problem is that I have it wrapped in the image, maybe I can make a RUN line to replace in the file, but I don't know where it is located from the package installation. Could you tell me where it is?
Thank you Benjamin! El mié, 7 sept 2022 a las 10:08, Benjamin Berg (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi, > > yes, the \vbox_unpack_drop:N command was removed from LaTeX 3. I > thought I had pushed out a new release with the fix, but maybe I forgot > about that? > > The fix for this is > > https://github.com/sdaps/sdaps-class/commit/88fcb3d4e11d9af20b79654e0232a31c37e54b61 > so you can possibly fix up sdapsarray.sty locally instead of upgrading. > > Benjamin > > > On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 17:41 +0200, Santiago Timón wrote: > > Hi! > > > > It has been a while since I have had to get into this. We are doing > > some additions to our questionnaire and I bumped into the weird > > situation where SDAPS setup seems unable to find base commands. > > > > To discard it has something to do with our code I have tried with the > > example tex. And it fails at line 71 with: > > ! Undefined control sequence. > > <argument> \vbox_unpack_drop:N > > \l_tmpa_box > > l.71 \markline{rendered equations} > > {ugly}{beautiful} > > > > I have tried finding the reason in the questionnaire.log but, > > although I'm not very good with LaTex, I don't see anything that > > could lead to the cause. Related class files and everything are > > copied in the project folder and referenced relative to it. > > image.png > > > > In my case, SDAPS is wrapped in a docker image I build with the > > ubuntu PPA. I updated to 1.9.10 around April, but didn't actually > > tried building anything, so I'm not sure if it is related to this > > update. The docker approach seemed to work fine. It is run: > > docker run -v $PWD:/workdir --rm --name sdaps-launcher > > sdaps/stable:latest setup tex $project $texfile > > > > I'm attaching the log and dockerfile in case it helps. The entry > > point is just sdaps "$@". > > I hope there is something obvious to you that I'm stupidly missing. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > -- Santi
