On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Frieder Ferlemann wrote:

> Hi Gordon,
>
> Gordon Henderson schrieb:
>>> is there any command that parses the .hex files and tells you the how
>>> much code ?
>>
>> Actually, I've just found out by accident that the standard unix 'size'
>> command will parse the hex files - approximately. I guess it just lumps
>> everything into one big segment, but it's almost right!
>>
>> If I can be bothered I'll write something, but it's good enough for now.
>
> you can use srec_info from the srecord package. Recommended anyway:)
> Cross platform. At http://srecord.sf.net

A-Ha ...

> example of its output:
>
>> srec_info interrupt.hex  --intel
> Format: Intel Hexadecimal (MCS-86)
> srec_info: interrupt.hex: 11: warning: data records not in strictly ascending
>    order (expected >= 0x00A5, got 0x0046)
> Data:   0000 - 0003
>        000B - 000D

OK...

$ srec_info thingy.hex --intel
Format: Intel Hexadecimal (MCS-86)
Data:   000000 - 0173E3
         300000 - 30000D

$ size ddplan.hex
    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
       0   95218       0   95218   173f2 thingy.hex

So size is recording the 14 extra bytes of config data in the 300000 range 
(and is in decimal). This is for a 96KB device - 98304 bytes - minus the 
bootloader... It's getting tight!

Another bit of code I have (hexfile only - I think MPLAB generated) comes 
out as:

Data:   000000 - 017F01
         200000 - 200007
         300000 - 30000D
         F00000 - F003FF

And that's why size reports it being bigger than the device.

Thanks,

Gordon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user

Reply via email to