Hi moderator of this group, Why is the reply-to address set to nore...@sourceforge.net ? Or the better question is, why is the reply-to field removed ? (I do not see it in the email headers)
I posted a response to this question about _bit keyword and of course it did not go through because I did not notice the wrong reply address, annoying. roelof ------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 20:47 -0800, SourceForge.net wrote: > please any one help me with this error Start by reading the manual, in particular this page : http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/doc/sdccman.html/node59.html#SECTION00441700000000000000 Or look at a processor header file like this : less /opt/sdcc/share/sdcc/include/mcs51/p89lpc938.h (I keep my compiler in /opt/, you might find the header files in /usr/local/share/sdcc/include/mcs51/) There is all the information you need to solve your problem. Hint : you do not need the "__at (0xyy)" to get your example compiling. The __at "command" is used to get access to a bit in a SFR for instance. The compiler will place your bit definition at the start of the RAM bit addresses which starts at 0x20. roelof ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
