Hi,
> This is intentionally: [...]
>
> Ok, I just found it peculiar, because only 18f*k22, added in gputils
> 0.14.x I think, were excluded, but pics added in gputils 0.15 and 1.0
> weren't. Also, it's only libdev18f*k22 that is excluded, libio18f*k22
> isn't.
>
Arrgh. I believe that I successfully built sdcc with gputils that did not
support excluded devices back then. I do not remember if I treated libio
specially ... And, yes, the list of 'new' devices has not been maintained
when new(er) devices have been added, which leads to the situation you
describe: some "older" devices are hidden whereas some "newer" ones are not.
Anyway, currently, there is more viable option at hand: The devices
supported by gputils are already auto-detected at configure time, so we
just (tm) need to generate proper automake conditionals from them and wrap
all device-specific stuff in these conditionals (libdev, libio) and --
voila -- we have a maintenance-free gputils-version-agnostic build system.
... or we would have, if someone found the time to implement it. This
should not be too hard since the Makefile.am are already auto-generated if
I am not mistaken...
Thanks for the report; maybe something good will come from it :-D
Best regards
Raphael
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
