On 09/23/2014 02:16 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > On 22.09.2014 01:37, Drew DeVault wrote: >> Hi there! I wanted to let you guys know what us KnightOS folks >> ended up doing with SDCC. You might remember my email a few >> months ago asking about some of our concerns. >> >> […] - Removed unneccessary subsystems such as the simulator[…] > > From an outisde perspective this seems unwise. How will you do > regression testing?
It's poorly documented and difficult to maintain. It's also C++ and we'd like to refactor out the C++ source. We may implement something similar based on our own z80e: https://github.com/KnightOS/z80e Which is much cleaner and more flexible (and only considers the needs of z80, admittedly). -- Drew DeVault ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
