On 12.08.2015 18:29, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:16:43 +0200
> Philipp Klaus Krause <p...@spth.de> wrote:
>
>> In standard C, each label has to be followed by a statement. HTis makes
>> a difference at the end of compoud statements.
>>
>> Not allowed:
>> {
>> label:
>> }
>>
>> Allowed:
>> {
>> label:;
>> }
>>
>> SDCC currently allows both. The comment in SDCC.y makes it clear, that
>> this is a deliberate extension.
>
> It's one almost every compiler accepts from the original K&R compiler
> through to gcc (although in more pedantic modes gcc bitches about it
> nowdays)
>
>> I would like to drop support for this non-standard extension. IMO
>> non-standard extensions should only be supported in SDCC where they
>> provide a substantial advantage, which IMO, is not the ccase here.
>
> It's "defacto" C even if not standard C. I don't think describing it as
> an "extension" is even an accurate description. It's tolerating a 'quirk'
> of the language much accepted by compilers.
>
> Does it cause complications to make it just warn instead ?
>
> AlanI now made it a warning in revision #9297. Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
