Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk-dh2bkuhe...@public.gmane.org> writes: > Do the option --nojtbound and the #pragma nojtbound have any users? >... > If the option and pragma do not have users, we might want to remove it.
Recently I had been confused by its name starting with "--no...." and used it the opposite way that I intended (disable all optimizations). Re-reading the docs cleared doubts, apologies for having reported a non-existent bug about it. I believe it may still be useful in careful hands, maybe renamed to "--enable-unsafe-skipjtbound" or similar, a name that conveys the fact that: - optimization is off by default - optimization is "unsafe" if turned on, i.e. not all legitimate C code is compatible with it On the other side it's probably some maintainance and documentation burden for modest benefits, so I won't object if it gets removed. Cheers, Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
