Am 28.02.2018 um 10:56 schrieb Vaclav Peroutka: > Hi Philipp, > > thank you for updated tables. But it seems that you forgot to update > texts ? I can see that SDCC's Dhrystone and Coremark values are the > highest but text states that "SDCC only achieves 0.17 DMIPS / MHz" or > "IAR with optimization for speed outperforms all others". That does not > correspond with graphs or did I miss something ?
Thanks, I forgot to update the text sections on code speed and size. It is done now. > > The funny side is that SDCC's coremark code with size opt is larger than > with speed opt. But generally - good job, Philipp! Similarly, Cosmic generates slower code for Dhrystone when optimizing for speed than when optimizing for size. Philipp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
