> > And the second is that for the system in general the vector table > > flash should be empty > > to be written (as from code running in ram) at a later point. > > And yes _that_ is a very special case. > > I am intrigued as to what your use-case is for dynamically installing > interrupt handlers at run-time.
well, it's just during development that this is used so flash lifetime is not that important. I have worked with a FORTH system for some years now (on the job). And the general system I like a lot, but the core of that system is written in assembler (and while fun to write not so much fun to change). So I am trying something with a core written in C and I would like to be able to add the ISRs at a later time when the core is already running on the chip. Regards, Karsten _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
