On 30.10.21 21:48, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Am 30.10.21 um 20:14 schrieb Basil Hussain:
Okay, it's not just me:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53608761/cant-get-define-working-with-sdasz80-sdcc-assembler
So, apparently it *isn't* supported in SDAS? Why on earth is it
mentioned so frequently in the bundled docs, then? Why do the sdas*
executables have a -b argument for displaying .define substitutions in
source listings?
Regards,
Basil Hussain
I suspect that the fork happened around the time those features were
added to asxxxx, so they are already in the manual, but haven't been
debugged to work well yet. Howver, I'm not sure about this.
The SDCC assembler / linker situation is clearly far from optimal.
Philipp
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
Wasn’t the fork merged with updates from upstream at some point? It
pretty much looked to me like docs from asxxxx were copied, but not all
features merged. It also had .tile for asgb in docs, but not
implemented, even though it wasn’t complicated code.
--
Freundliche Grüße / Yours sincerely
Sebastian „Baŝto“ Riedel
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
