On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:46:46 +0200
Benedikt Freisen <b.frei...@gmx.net> wrote:
> What about an additional pre-processing stage that transforms syntax
> variant 1 to variant 2?
Right now you can use __asm at points where it's not a C statement
boundary, or potentially even in C code. I guess it would depend a lot on
the parser how it coped with stuff like
__asm
.area _DISCARD
__endasm
void foo(void) {
blah();
}
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
