Not really... I just think that you're using the wrong Object ID in the check. But it's hard to be sure without having a closer look at what you're doing.
I think you can assume it is NOT an eZ bug. If you go to http://<domain>/<admin_siteaccess>/content/view/full/<node_id> for the object that has reverse related objects, then get the OBJECT_ID of that node, I'm sure the reverse_related_objects_count fetch will work. On 18 May 2011 15:21, Alessio <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > Any Idea? > > *From:* Luc Chase <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, May 16, 2011 2:37 PM > *To:* Alessio <[email protected]> > *Cc:* mailing ezpublish <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [Sdk-public] Knowing whether an object has at least one > reverse related object > > I don't remember if you already tried this... > > http://doc.ez.no/eZ-Publish/Technical-manual/4.x/Reference/Modules/content/Fetch-functions/reverse_related_objects_count > > On 16 May 2011 13:32, Luc Chase <[email protected]> wrote: > >> you said here that node 197 shows reverse related objects... yes? >> >> >> On 13 May 2011 16:04, Alessio <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes, I'm sure because through the administration interface I've seen >>> the reports to the objects >>> but I'll try anyway >>> >>> I have deliberately left a node without relations. >>> >>> >>> *From:* Luc Chase <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, May 13, 2011 4:58 PM >>> *To:* Alessio <[email protected]> >>> *Cc:* mailing ezpublish <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [Sdk-public] Knowing whether an object has at least one >>> reverse related object >>> >>> I think it is ok.... you sure that some of those children have >>> reverse-related-objects? >>> >>> Try it with a simpler example... >>> {fetch( 'content', 'node', hash( 'node_id', 88 ) >>> ).object.reverse_related_contentobject_count} >>> >>> replace 88 with the node_id of the one you know has >>> reverse_related_objects >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13 May 2011 15:45, Alessio <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I have: >>>> >>>> *{foreach* *fetch_alias(* 'children'*,* *hash(* 'parent_node_id'*,* * >>>> $node.node_id* *)* *)* *as* *$item* *}* >>>> * >>>> >>>> { >>>> $item.object.reverse_related_contentobject_count} {* <--- copy paste >>>> error *}* >>>> >>>> *{/foreach}* >>>> But does not work, It's correct? >>>> >>>> *From:* Luc Chase <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 13, 2011 4:36 PM >>>> *To:* Alessio <[email protected]> >>>> *Cc:* mailing ezpublish <[email protected]> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Sdk-public] Knowing whether an object has at least one >>>> reverse related object >>>> >>>> remember not to confuse object_id and node_id >>>> >>>> On 13 May 2011 15:19, Alessio <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> {$node.object.reverse_related_contentobject_count} does not work. >>>>> >>>>> I'm searching with {$node|attribute(show,<number>)} ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Luc Chase <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 13, 2011 3:56 PM >>>>> *To:* Alessio <[email protected]> >>>>> *Cc:* mailing ezpublish <[email protected]> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Sdk-public] Knowing whether an object has at least one >>>>> reverse related object >>>>> >>>>> See also fetch reverse related objects count... >>>>> >>>>> http://doc.ez.no/eZ-Publish/Technical-manual/4.x/Reference/Modules/content/Fetch-functions/related_objects_count >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 13 May 2011 14:36, Alessio <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> I need to know whether an object has reverse related objects >>>>>> I found this code: >>>>>> {def $objects=fetch( 'content', 'reverse_related_objects', >>>>>> hash( 'object_id', $node_id ) ) >>>>>> $counter = 0} >>>>>> >>>>>> {foreach $objects as $object} >>>>>> {set $counter=$counter+1} >>>>>> {/foreach} >>>>>> this here: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://doc.ez.no/eZ-Publish/Techn...ch-functions/reverse_related_objects<http://doc.ez.no/eZ-Publish/Technical-manual/4.x/Reference/Modules/content/Fetch-functions/reverse_related_objects> >>>>>> In this way I "count" the number of reverse related objects, but I'm >>>>>> sure there is another way, because I just want to know if the object has >>>>>> reverse objects related or not, I think it's a waste of resources. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sdk-public mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/sdk-public >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Luc. >>>>> M. +44.7040-901-582 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Luc. >>>> M. +44.7040-901-582 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Luc. >>> M. +44.7040-901-582 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Luc. >> M. +44.7040-901-582 >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Luc. > M. +44.7040-901-582 > > > > -- Luc. M. +44.7040-901-582
-- Sdk-public mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/sdk-public
