On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 10:32, John Beppu wrote: > I was just saying that I, as a private individual who uses > SDL_Perl, found your patches useful. I don't have any > authority or maintainership over the SDL_Perl code.
Okay, this answers my question. :) > But damn... how many forks of SDL_Perl do we need? > We got dave's, chromatic's, and now yours. > I personally like your's the best, because it's > like dave's latest + bug fixes + unobtrusive enhancements. > But how can we bring about some kind of unification? > What would it take? I'm not sure. I prefer not think of my fork as a fork, since the only reason I'm making different version available is because whoever is supposed to be maintainer is Missing In Action (which is as good a reason as any for there to be a fork, I suppose). I also don't have CPAN access. I'm not sure I really want to be a maintainer because I know jack shit about this new build system (which seems to be getting popular just as I was starting to understand the old build method). Come to think of it, I kind of liked the old system because you could abort it before building if you didn't have all the SDL library deps installed that you wanted. Andy.
