-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Moin,
On Saturday 26 November 2005 11:11, Andy wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 10:27 +0100, Tels wrote: > > Not to discourage you but what version of SDL are you using/patching > > against? > > > > I lost the overview on what is current and where. > > sdl.perl.org says 2.1.0 is new, but that news entry is dated 2004. The > link takes you to CPAN, where the latest is 2.1.3. My patches will be > against the contents of the 2.1.3 tarball, until a newer version comes > out. I have 2.1.3 installed in my perl system directories, and my > modified files go into a local ./lib sub-directory of my current > project for testing and diff-generation. http://search.cpan.org/~dgoehrig/SDL_Perl-2.1.3/ is from 2005-10-05, so fairly recent, but the changelog hasn't been updated. David? > I'm not grabbing stuff from SVN since I want to work from currently > available releases, rather than be bleeding-edge. I couldn't even say where the SVN repository is :) > I appreciate the fact that all my previous patches (back from 2003 and > 2004) made it into the public release (and the cleanup/integration of > my SDL::Event::set_type into SDL::Event::type made much more sense). As I said, I lost track of my contributions. Rather sad :/ Best wishes, Tels - -- Signed on Sat Nov 26 11:27:01 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo." -- Andy Finkel, computer guy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBQ4g4z3cLPEOTuEwVAQEIsAf/SHih84hX27TL4gQIhl90gEW7e+ORNWeg yo3+8uyHLx8ciJswji9lTSwxOe3U2q6vvCrMS8mIeC2meIBVQDbBpjb9Zorg1nZf e5rUr/zc2WVAV1rZ72wmnbyjA4dhsasfQlkx9rc7Nlm8ZEFGDBXElFngXEQR7utZ HzWJ71sGlb6RdZ7GzSY93dJRDt7v1XMIabavHUKcOgUn1B1dxnwEa5Vi4R4ns7R6 fvYT0wdzeIunl2DPVcA7AL0BExhbuq52iZtXNDzPKgFDQn2ipovk0SzkVEqt51SJ 7mZNcDgXKYaEl1mt15TrGi9lqsZOIt0DwUEC4NI2jk9xvWzG3T0P3Q== =C7Gd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
