Netbeans is getting to be pretty good. And if you like
editting with vi, there's a vi plugin. A few months ago
I would have called netbeans/vi "difficult" at best, but
it's come a long way since then. It allows you to build
keyboard macros and so on as well, can manage your dev
servers and logs, has a debugger, etc. Just in case you
wanted more options to look at.
-glenn
Cliff Rhyne wrote:
> Thanks! I've been looking for a better tool for Windows.
>
> On Jan 9, 1:11 pm, "Adam Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ohh, I like that TextMate bundle idea. As a Winblows user, I can still use
>> it (www.e-texteditor.com), so release away!
>>
>> And if anyone wants to release $2000 to me for a Mac laptop as well, much
>> appreciated :)
>>
>> - Adam
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2008 7:42 PM, Matt Aimonetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Darn it Rob, you stole my line! ;)
>>> I think I should release my TextMate bundle with all the goodies I use.
>>> (scaffolding for Specs, views etc...)
>>> Actually, maybe we should make an official SDRuby textmate bundle. (sorry
>>> Linux/Windows users)
>>> Ohh and if you switch to Rails 2.0 you HAVE to use REST, actually even if
>>> you stick to 1.2.x you should be using REST.
>>> Btw, for those interested, Rails 2.1 might have i18n/l10n - TzTime builtin
>>> - potential new ActiveRecord SQL generation/tables relationships and much
>>> more. ooohh and Rails is already almost functional with Ruby 1.9 !!!
>>> -Matt
>>> On 1/8/08, Rob Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> To emphasize on of Patrick's points: if you do "ruby script/generate
>>>> scaffold Model name:string content:text price:decimal" then your views
>>>> come out with all the column known (and very ugly <b> labels ;-)
>>>> To beat Matt Aimonetti to the punch: it really should read "ruby
>>>> script/generate rspec_scaffold Model name:string content:text
>>>> price:decimal"
>>>> Rob
>>>> On Jan 7, 2008 9:52 PM, Patrick Crowley < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> One issue specifically that I've noticed is that "script/generate
>>>>>> scaffold" doesn't have the same "wow" factor that it had in 1.x.
>>>>>> Since the form isn't generated, it makes it a little harder for the
>>>>>> Rails novice and takes away one of Rails big selling points.
>>>>> As a community, we've really moved away from scaffolding.
>>>>> While scaffolding made for a sexy demo, it wasn't very useful.
>>>>> Inevitably, you'd need to rip out the scaffold code and replace it
>>>>> with your own stuff.
>>>>> The new scaffolding style may be confusing for newbies, or those who
>>>>> want to build a blog app in 15 minutes, but it's very helpful if you
>>>>> wish to build REST-based applications.
>>>>> 1. Run script/generate scaffold Model. (Pass the fields you want as
>>>>> extra parameters to the scaffold command.)
>>>>> 2. If you didn't specify your fields above, add them to your database
>>>>> migration and new/edit action views.
>>>>> 3. Run rake db:migrate.
>>>>> -- Patrick
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
SD Ruby mailing list
sdruby@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
