Passenger 2.2.2 fixed the major Nginx/SSL bug...I've got 2 sites running in production with Ruby 1.8 without an issue...
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:24 AM, liquid_rails <cheri.anacle...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Has anyone experienced problems with nginx? I've been reading on the > web about potential problems with nginx + ssl... Thanks > > > > > Matt, > > > An important nuance indeed =-) I gavenginx+passenger a good > > > pounding under Ruby 1.9 before recommending it > onhttp://Ruby19orbust.com, but I did not try SSL. Using Passenger under > > > Apache does seem to in wider use at the moment so that may have the > > > stability advantage. > > > > > Rob > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:36, Matt Aimonetti <mattaimone...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Rob, I agree with one small nuance, thenginx/passenger module is > pretty new > > > > and might still be slightly buggy. (some people reported issues with > SSL > > > > etc..) > > > > I don't think it's a big deal and knowing the phusion guys, I > wouldn't worry > > > > too much. However, you have been warned ;) > > > > > > - Matt > > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Rob Kaufman <rgkauf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> My current preference isNginx+ Passenger + Rails + MySQL as well. > > > >> Deciding between Apache orNginxis fairly simple in my book. If > > > >> you're an Apache guru already, or if you need to run something else > on > > > >> the box that is easier in Apache (like a PHP blog, CMS, etc) choose > > > >> Apache, otherwise chooseNginx. Nginxis simpler to configure and > > > >> uses less memory, but it does not do as many tricks and Apache does. > > > > > >> Best, > > > >> Rob > > > > > >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:25, Matt Aimonetti < > mattaimone...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > Most of the official Rails sites and 37signals use: Apache + > Passenger > > > >> > + > > > >> > Rails + MySQL > > > >> > It's the easiest deployment solution and it works very well. My > only > > > >> > problem > > > >> > with Passenger is that if you don't get much traffic, all the > workers > > > >> > get > > > >> > killed and the next request coming up will take a little while. > > > >> > (workarounds > > > >> > exist and the Phusion team is working on adding a min amount of > workers) > > > > > >> > Also, if you want to play with passenger on your local machine, > you can > > > >> > find > > > >> > a really useful Passenger Panel Preference. > > > >> > (If you are comfortable using Postres, I'd probably suggest you > use it > > > >> > instead of MySQL) > > > > > >> > - Matt > > > > > >> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:20 PM, liquid_rails > > > >> > <cheri.anacle...@gmail.com> > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> >> There are several options for setting up a Rails app, e.g. > > > > > >> >> - Nginx, Rails and Thin; PostgreSQL; > > > >> >> - Nginx, Rails and Thin; MySQL > > > >> >> - Nginx, Rails and mongrels; MySQL > > > >> >> - Apache, Rails and Mongrels; PostgreSQL > > > > > >> >> etc., you get the idea. (Seehttp:// > articles.slicehost.com/sitemap) > > > > > >> >> Is there a general consensus as to which is the best setup in > terms of > > > >> >> weight and efficiency to go with? > > > > > >> >> Thanks, > > > > > >> >> Cheri- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ SD Ruby mailing list sdruby@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
