I've used it for a bunch of sites, and almost all of them I've customized most of them. The development is stable, they commit pretty often, which sometimes is frustrating... Lots of migrations. and time revving the refinery itself. I don't know if they changed, but their image management s***ed. I ended up writing my own stuff. The images were shared across pages and there was no way to find if a image was orphan or if it was used. But as far as software, they have a sweet way to develop plugins, that is easier than radiant. I only have one site running on rails 3, and it was pretty much the same thing as the others. The mailing list is also very welcoming. []'s Rafael Cardoso
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Adam Grant <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Gang, > > http://refinerycms.com > > Has anyone used this sweet looking CMS engine running on Rails 3? I'm > evaluating it against RadiantCMS (http://radiantcms.org), but Refinery is > winning because of ~stable~ Rails 3.0 support (there's a Radiant branch or > something...) > > I'd love to hear your thoughts. > > They've sold me into at least *TRYING* it through their judicious and > unabashed use of Rick Astley's persona. > > Bravo, > - Adam > > *"Insert witty quote here." -Me* > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
