> As a bit of a teaser, here’s my numbers running the red/black tree > benchmark <https://gist.github.com/1493911> from above (the numbers are > time in seconds). Compared to JRuby on Java 6, JRuby on Java 7 > *without*invokedynamic > is around 25% faster, and JRuby with invokedynamic is nearly *3 times* > faster.
Unless your app is based on the red/black tree benchmark I wouldn't jump to conclusion to quickly. Also... once again, is your app IO bound or CPU bound? - Matt On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Kirn <[email protected]> wrote: > "Compared to JRuby on Java 6, JRuby on Java 7 without invokedynamic is > around 25% faster, and JRuby with invokedynamic is nearly 3 times faster." > > http://blog.jruby.org/2011/12/getting_started_with_jruby_and_java_7/ > > I think it's time to give JRuby another try. I dismissed it as buggy and > irrelevant when I first played with it a few years ago, but it's starting > to look more and more interesting. Does anybody here use JRuby in > production? Any war stories to share? Bugs? Gem support issues? > > Thanks, > > Andreas > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
