Thanks, Guyren -- no, it's not for an ID, it's mostly for display purposes.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Guyren Howe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Chris McCann wrote: > > I can't sort out how to keep a JS var to hold the "next" increment number > and to set the hidden field value to that value when the new nested fields > are added. > > > If this is so you can generate a valid ID of some sort, consider using a > UUID instead. > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
