On Feb 11, 2013, at 7:54 , Etienne de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Have you played around with ConceptNet5 at all? > http://conceptnet5.media.mit.edu/ I am finding the "ConceptuallyRelatedTo" > relationships between phrases most useful. I haven't used it directly, but I am aware of it. It provides a different quality of information — conceptnet is a bit simpler and easier to work with than Cyc, but at least some of Cyc's content will be deeper or at least more complex. Sounds like whatever this mysterious project is, it is most interesting. I hope you are able to do a presentation on it, at least if you get anywhere (it is a deep, deep rabbit hole you are exploring). -- -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SD Ruby" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
