On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Kevin O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote: > > The only thing I can think of would be to post-process the assembler > and replace "retl" instructions with "retw $2" instructions. I'm not > sure if it would work and it would be real ugly. >
As I mentionned, ret is not the only instruction causing problems. I've identified issues with leave, enter, iret, and even some forms of the call instruction, and the list is probaly not complete yet. So it could be even more complicated that we think. It looks like x86emu was never tested with gcc produced code before. And it looks like handling of the 0x66 instruction prefix has been neglected in a lot of different places in the code. -- Julian _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
