On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:07:50PM -0600, Dave Frodin wrote: > Peter, > > You're right, that u64 cast wasn't needed, but I needed to cast the result to > u32. > The (void*) is evidently expecting a u32. Is that correct? Would SeaBIOS > always be > expecting a u32 for an address to execute from? > > I also cleaned up the macro to use the existing ntohl. > The new patch is below. I also tested it.
Thanks for catching this. I think it would be worthwhile to clean up the byteorder calls - see a patch I've sent in a separate email. -Kevin _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
