On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 19:41 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:28:11PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > Does QEMU_HARDWARE mean hardware "defined" (so to speak) by QEMU (e.g. > > > virtio type stuff) or does it include regular hardware emulated by QEMU > > > (e.g. real IDE disks etc). Xen uses the latter but not the former. The > > > use of the symbol in both the CONFIG_VIRTIO_FOO and scsi_drive_setup() > > > suggests it covers both? > > > > I think it's supposed to be the former, and would argue (and submit > > patches) that it *should* be the case even if Kevin's patch series > > doesn't quite do that. > > The intent was to implement the former (QEMU_HARDWARE encapsulate > virtual hardware and hardware we only trust in virtual environments - > virtio, lsi, esp, debug io, etc). Did the patch get something wrong?
I don't think so, although my Xen patch may have screwed it up if they do indeed use the fw_cfg stuff. I meant to ask about that; thanks for catching it. -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
