On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Kevin O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:50:27PM -0800, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > Yes, I think it's worth having them in upstream SeaBIOS! > > > > I've been thinking about creating a way of passing this information > between > > coreboot and SeaBIOS in the future, so we don't have to keep the handlers > > around twice. One way of doing that would be to have the handler live in > > SMM and have SeaBIOS do an SMI command to get the right answers. Would > you > > be open to something like that? > > That seems over kill to me. The Intel VGA stuff seems to be pretty > stable and it's only a few fields that need to be passed back. What > about placing the required info in a coreboot table - then SeaBIOS can > just pass back the desired fields and not have to have board by board > specific logic. > Ok.. Let's see how this goes for future boards. I think that could work > > BTW, I didn't port over "Alex" as it seems to be totally different > from the other boards. > Great. Alex was an old Atom system that was never shipped with coreboot -- Stefan Reinauer Google Inc.
_______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
