On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 05:31:26PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 17:21 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 04:52:17PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > > > commit c6e298e1f12e0f4ca02b6da5e42919ae055f6830 > > > hw/pci: reserve IO and mem for pci-2-pci bridges with no devices > > > attached > > > > > > introduced support for hot-plugging devices behind pci-2-pci bridges. > > > Extend hotplug support also for pci express downstream ports. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > src/fw/pciinit.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > src/hw/pci_regs.h | 2 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/src/fw/pciinit.c b/src/fw/pciinit.c > > > index 0ad548f..edb3fe9 100644 > > > --- a/src/fw/pciinit.c > > > +++ b/src/fw/pciinit.c > > > @@ -636,6 +636,25 @@ pci_region_create_entry(struct pci_bus *bus, struct > > > pci_device *dev, > > > return entry; > > > } > > > > > > +static int pci_bus_hotplug_support(struct pci_bus *bus) > > > +{ > > > + u8 shpc_cap = pci_find_capability(bus->bus_dev, PCI_CAP_ID_SHPC); > > > + u8 pcie_cap = pci_find_capability(bus->bus_dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); > > > + int downstream_port = 0; > > > + int slot_implemented = 0; > > > + > > > + if (pcie_cap) { > > > + u16 pcie_flags = pci_config_readw(bus->bus_dev->bdf, > > > + pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_FLAGS); > > > + u16 port_type = ((pcie_flags & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_TYPE) >> > > > + PCI_EXP_FLAGS_TYPE_SHIFT) & 0xf; > > > > 0xf is not needed here: PCI_EXP_FLAGS_TYPE is enough. > > Also should be u8. > OK, thanks > > > > > + downstream_port = (port_type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) || > > > + (port_type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT); > > > > This is correct, the spec says: > > Configuration Space, and other capabilities. > > 8 Slot Implemented – When Set, this bit indicates that the Link > > HwInit associated with this Port is connected to a slot (as compared to > > being connected to a system-integrated device or being > > disabled). > > This bit is valid for Downstream Ports. This bit is undefined for > > Upstream Ports. > > > > Maybe add a comment in case people will wonder. > Sure > > > > > > + slot_implemented = !!(pcie_flags & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_SLOT); > > > > I would do > > return downstream_port && slot_implemented; > > here, avoid testing shpc for express devices. > > > > Also allows moving downstream_port && slot_implemented here. > Makes sense > > > > > > + } > > > + return shpc_cap || (downstream_port && slot_implemented); > > > +} > > > + > > > static int pci_bios_check_devices(struct pci_bus *busses) > > > { > > > dprintf(1, "PCI: check devices\n"); > > > @@ -678,7 +697,7 @@ static int pci_bios_check_devices(struct pci_bus > > > *busses) > > > continue; > > > struct pci_bus *parent = > > > &busses[pci_bdf_to_bus(s->bus_dev->bdf)]; > > > int type; > > > - u8 shpc_cap = pci_find_capability(s->bus_dev, PCI_CAP_ID_SHPC); > > > + int hotplug_support = pci_bus_hotplug_support(s); > > > for (type = 0; type < PCI_REGION_TYPE_COUNT; type++) { > > > u64 align = (type == PCI_REGION_TYPE_IO) ? > > > PCI_BRIDGE_IO_MIN : PCI_BRIDGE_MEM_MIN; > > > @@ -687,7 +706,7 @@ static int pci_bios_check_devices(struct pci_bus > > > *busses) > > > if (pci_region_align(&s->r[type]) > align) > > > align = pci_region_align(&s->r[type]); > > > u64 sum = pci_region_sum(&s->r[type]); > > > - if (!sum && shpc_cap) > > > + if (!sum && hotplug_support) > > > sum = align; /* reserve min size for hot-plug */ > > > u64 size = ALIGN(sum, align); > > > int is64 = pci_bios_bridge_region_is64(&s->r[type], > > > diff --git a/src/hw/pci_regs.h b/src/hw/pci_regs.h > > > index e5effd4..6a71569 100644 > > > --- a/src/hw/pci_regs.h > > > +++ b/src/hw/pci_regs.h > > > @@ -426,6 +426,8 @@ > > > #define PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2 40 /* Device Control 2 */ > > > #define PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_ARI 0x20 /* Alternative Routing-ID */ > > > > > > +#define PCI_EXP_FLAGS_TYPE_SHIFT 4 > > > + > > > > It's generally not a good idea to randomly add macros > > in random places. > > In this case this is not needed. Just call __ffs on > > PCI_EXP_FLAGS_TYPE. > I didn't see any usage of __ffs method on seabios code, so > I wondered if adding an include to string.h would be ok. > Would it? > > Thanks, > Marcel
No - seabios has its own string.h, but src/x86.h has __ffs. Or you can use __builtin_ffs: it's optimized out for a constant parameter, anyway. > > > > > /* Extended Capabilities (PCI-X 2.0 and Express) */ > > > #define PCI_EXT_CAP_ID(header) (header & 0x0000ffff) > > > #define PCI_EXT_CAP_VER(header) ((header >> 16) & 0xf) > > > -- > > > 1.8.3.1 > > _______________________________________________ SeaBIOS mailing list [email protected] http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
