On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 20:15, George Gastaldi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nice, I agree that it is the right way to go. I was almost suggesting > separating that on a separate module also. > > However it must be considered that JTA would not always be used (when > running on tomcat for example). How would this module handle these scenarios > ? Would it depend on persistence module itself ? > The Seam transaction API is an abstraction over JTA. It provides the same interface, but can accommodate a different providers underneath. For instance, you should be able to adapt it to any single resource transaction (recognizing that you lose multiple resource enlistment) (similar to what spring does: http://www.infoq.com/articles/spring-modules-jcr). The module could even go a step further and provide simplified transaction configuration for JTA in a standalone environment. I think there is a lot of interesting avenues to explore, which is why having it in a separate module makes a ton of sense. The floor is open for discussion. -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
