> 3. weld-core > I have changed catching exception from ResourceLoadingException to > Throwable. It is widest possible catch declaration, in fact catching > specific exceptions would be probably better or GAE exceptions should > be catch deeper and rethrown as ResourceLoadingException. > > There is problem with adding this classes during deployment: > org.jboss.seam.solder.bean.generic.GenericBeanExtension$1 > org.jboss.seam.solder.util.collections.AbstractMultiset$ElementSet$1 > org.jboss.logging.JBossLogManagerProvider > org.jboss.seam.solder.bean.defaultbean.DefaultBeanExtension$1 > org.jboss.seam.solder.util.collections.AbstractMultimap$KeySet$1 > org.jboss.logging.Log4jLogger > org.jboss.logging.JBossLogManagerLogger > >>> Caused by: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied >>> (java.lang.RuntimePermission accessDeclaredMembers)
What exactly is the issue here? Reflection should still work on GAE. > 4. weld-core > In InstantiatorFactory I have commented out adding > ReflectionFactoryInstantiator. It is not allowed to use > ReflectionFactory on GAE. Adding reflection factory should be check > programmatically before creating new instance in some if clause. > >>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun.reflect.ReflectionFactory is a >>> restricted class. Please see the Google App Engine developer's guide for >>> more details. >>> at >>> com.google.appengine.runtime.Request.process-609c29691be26e8f(Request.java) >>> at sun.reflect.ReflectionFactory.<clinit>(ReflectionFactory.java) >>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:43) >>> at >>> org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.instantiation.ReflectionFactoryInstantiator.<init>(ReflectionFactoryInstantiator.java:45) This looks like RFI should catch Throwable instead of Exception in ctor. And I haven't hit this. When does InstantiatorFactory get used? > I have not tested yet which solder features are working and which ones > not. In wicket page injection works as expected. Solder works for me, but I only use @Resource handling atm. > If you are interested in providing support for GAE, I think it would > be great to have this changes apply to master branch. Some of them > (especially 3 and 4) need some more development and propably support > from weld team. If you can provide some example / test, I'll definitely have a look at this. I'm playing with GAE for some JavaEE+GAE portability POC, I'll post about exactly what I'm doing asap -- probably around JBW time. -Ales _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
