[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAM-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588699#comment-12588699
]
Brian Leathem commented on SEAM-42:
-----------------------------------
It's not clear to me what the implications are of adding a Seam Conversation
dependency to an application. Would there be a way to use the CDI conversation
with the @Begin/@End annotations?
Is there a case to be made for people who want to use Seam Faces to ease
JSF/CDI development, but who don't necessarily want to go whole-hog with Seam
Conversation? Do we want to keep the @Begin/@End annotations in Faces for such
a use case? I for one would be wary of using Seam Conversation while it's in
early days, but like taking advantage of the @Begin/@End annotations.
> @Begin and @End could be moved to the Seam Conversation module
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SEAM-42
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAM-42
> Project: Seam 3
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Conversation Management
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0.CR1
> Reporter: DRAI William
>
> @Begin and @End unfortunately cannot be used with another view technology.
> That would be nice to remove the dependency on Seam Faces and move them to
> Seam Conversation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
seam-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-issues
