[ 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBSEAM-5075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marek Novotny updated JBSEAM-5075:
----------------------------------

    Comment: was deleted

(was: Graph attached. I'll continue on investigation of mentioned issues. )

    
> Improve Seam2.3 performance
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBSEAM-5075
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBSEAM-5075
>             Project: Seam 2
>          Issue Type: Enhancement
>          Components: Performance and Scalability
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0.Final
>         Environment: AS 7.1.3.Final (EAP 6.0.1)
>            Reporter: Tomas Remes
>
> I've run several performance (especially load) tests comparing Seam2.3 to 
> Seam2.2. I am using modified numberguess example running on AS 7.1.3.Final 
> (EAP 6.0.1). Major difference between those two versions is that Seam2.2 uses 
> JSF-1.2 (Mojarra-1.2_15-b01-FCS) and Seam2.3 uses JSF-2.1 (Mojarra 
> 2.1.13-jbossorg-1). The tests shows significantly worse results of Seam2.3 
> release especially in response time values. Literally Seam2.3 reaches only 
> about 50% of response time values in comparison to Seam2.2 version. In other 
> words that is two times worse. Profiling shows following points, which can be 
> IMHO improved:
> 1) Implementation of SeamVieHandler's restoreView method. This method 
> currently allocates approximately 10x times more memory than related one from 
> Seam2.2 (it uses FaceletViewHandler.restoreView). Removing (returning to 
> Seam2.2 implementation) following lines from this method can bring 
> performance improvement (I've already tried that): 
> {noformat}
>       UIViewRoot viewRoot =viewHandler.restoreView(ctx, viewId);
>       if (viewRoot != null)
>       {
>          viewRoot.setViewId(viewHandler.deriveViewId(ctx,viewId));
>       }
> {noformat}
> 2) Implementation of Contexts.isPageContextActive method. This also shows 
> some regression when comparing memory allocation to related methods - 
> ConversationPropagation.restoreConversationId and 
> Manager.restoreConversation. IMHO this can be reimplemented somehow too.
> 3) Implementation of StatusMessages.instance() method. This also brings small 
> regression in memory allocation. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
seam-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-issues

Reply via email to