On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Tai Nguyen (tainguye)
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/12 1:52 PM, "William Roberts" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>>On 11/29/2012 08:53 AM, Tai Nguyen (tainguye) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>For enterprise devices, we need to be able to support our customer
>>>>troubleshooting issues.
>>>>Thus, we need to have shell access to do exploring tasks like
>>>>- ps
>>You can use the Android SDK to get a list of processes
>
> Well, customers may not have Android SDK. Plus, they may buy different
> devices and some of them may not be android based. So, having the same
> interface for different models is desirable.

System shows you the running processes, apps, etc.

>
>>>>- grep
>>Isn't even on the device
>
> Our products are not purely Android. We have lots of add-on features.

Device specific policies then, the base policy is for Reference
Android tablets and handsets

>
>>>>- exec diagnostic tools
>>Standard Android debugging tools work, with NDK gdb debugging support
>>recently being addressed (still WIP AFIK)
>
> These may be vendor/feature specific tool, not Android specific tool

Again custom policies... It looks like you need a more lenient policy,
you can achieve this by adding the
proper statements in your device specific policy.

>
> Tai
>



-- 
Respectfully,

William C Roberts

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the seandroid-list mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [email protected] with
the words "unsubscribe seandroid-list" without quotes as the message.

Reply via email to