On 01/16/2015 01:00 PM, Avijit Das wrote:
> 
> 
>> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:07:50 -0500
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: kernel panic in selinux driver
>>
>> On 01/16/2015 04:24 AM, Avijit Das wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I am seeing kernel panic in selinux code sometime during boot up and on
>> > random scenarios. Has anyone encountered similar issue. Any help in this
>> > is highly appreciated.
>> Those would appear to be bugs in the kernel credential handling code
>> rather than in SELinux; SELinux is just the messenger. What kernel
>> version are you using?
> 
> [Avijit] I am using kernel version 3.10 

I don't know if it is related, but Linux 3.10.38 includes this fix for a
race in the wait code.



>From a756e3d4c71d3de28373076da2552260741f3d0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 15:38:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] wait: fix reparent_leader() vs EXIT_DEAD->EXIT_ZOMBIE race

commit dfccbb5e49a621c1b21a62527d61fc4305617aca upstream.

wait_task_zombie() first does EXIT_ZOMBIE->EXIT_DEAD transition and
drops tasklist_lock.  If this task is not the natural child and it is
traced, we change its state back to EXIT_ZOMBIE for ->real_parent.

The last transition is racy, this is even documented in 50b8d257486a
"ptrace: partially fix the do_wait(WEXITED) vs EXIT_DEAD->EXIT_ZOMBIE
race".  wait_consider_task() tries to detect this transition and clear
->notask_error but we can't rely on ptrace_reparented(), debugger can
exit and do ptrace_unlink() before its sub-thread sets EXIT_ZOMBIE.

And there is another problem which were missed before: this transition
can also race with reparent_leader() which doesn't reset >exit_signal if
EXIT_DEAD, assuming that this task must be reaped by someone else.  So
the tracee can be re-parented with ->exit_signal != SIGCHLD, and if
/sbin/init doesn't use __WALL it becomes unreapable.

Change reparent_leader() to update ->exit_signal even if EXIT_DEAD.
Note: this is the simple temporary hack for -stable, it doesn't try to
solve all problems, it will be reverted by the next changes.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Jan Kratochvil <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: Lennart Poettering <[email protected]>
Cc: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/exit.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 7bb73f9..80495a1 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -570,9 +570,6 @@ static void reparent_leader(struct task_struct *father, struct task_struct *p,
 				struct list_head *dead)
 {
 	list_move_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
-
-	if (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD)
-		return;
 	/*
 	 * If this is a threaded reparent there is no need to
 	 * notify anyone anything has happened.
@@ -580,9 +577,19 @@ static void reparent_leader(struct task_struct *father, struct task_struct *p,
 	if (same_thread_group(p->real_parent, father))
 		return;
 
-	/* We don't want people slaying init.  */
+	/*
+	 * We don't want people slaying init.
+	 *
+	 * Note: we do this even if it is EXIT_DEAD, wait_task_zombie()
+	 * can change ->exit_state to EXIT_ZOMBIE. If this is the final
+	 * state, do_notify_parent() was already called and ->exit_signal
+	 * doesn't matter.
+	 */
 	p->exit_signal = SIGCHLD;
 
+	if (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD)
+		return;
+
 	/* If it has exited notify the new parent about this child's death. */
 	if (!p->ptrace &&
 	    p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE && thread_group_empty(p)) {
-- 
1.9.3

_______________________________________________
Seandroid-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected].
To get help, send an email containing "help" to 
[email protected].

Reply via email to