DIS: Re: BUS: 'Cause I deserve it
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: I object because there is a proposal pending to award champion and e shouldn't get both The proposal is presently unlikely to pass. I'd rather em not get neither...
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 'Cause I deserve it
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Ah, the Agora the Beautiful mousetrap. Meant to mention that *that* likely doesn't work either: http://cfj.qoid.us/1290 (summary: you can't repurpose one kind of announcement to make the announcer perform secondary *UNINTENDED* actions against eir will). Yeah, you're probably right. Of course I am not attempting to make you perform a directly game-relevant action on your own behalf, merely 'trigger' something, but I suppose exercising power of attorney is fundamentally an action by the exerciser. Now, this public message obviously alludes to the PoA, so it's fine. I hereby use it to state that, any time I make a public statement that does *not* explicitly allude to this PoA, I am specifically ignoring, therefore implicitly alluding to, the possibility of triggering the PoA. This, however, I think does not work :)
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 'Cause I deserve it
On Sat, 30 May 2015, Alex Smith wrote: On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 01:11 +0200, Ørjan Johansen wrote: On Fri, 29 May 2015, Alex Smith wrote: I endorse aranea. -- ais523 who has a feeling that this doesn't actually work Are you referring to endorsing for support/objection (which doesn't seem to be an Agoran decision and so wouldn't be covered by 2127), or do you think there's some bug with 649? It's a strong suspicion that endorsing doesn't work for Agoran Consent. The only way we could twist it would be to interpret it as aranea has the power of attorney to act for me on this specific matter, which e activates by acting emself. That's a bit of a long stretch for the term endorse though it's pretty clearly the desired outcome... the main reason I wouldn't favor it is that *you* didn't explicitly intend PoA to come into play, and PoA shouldn't be allowed without fully informed consent. -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 'Cause I deserve it
On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 01:11 +0200, Ørjan Johansen wrote: On Fri, 29 May 2015, Alex Smith wrote: I endorse aranea. -- ais523 who has a feeling that this doesn't actually work Are you referring to endorsing for support/objection (which doesn't seem to be an Agoran decision and so wouldn't be covered by 2127), or do you think there's some bug with 649? It's a strong suspicion that endorsing doesn't work for Agoran Consent. -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: 'Cause I deserve it
On Fri, 29 May 2015, Alex Smith wrote: I endorse aranea. -- ais523 who has a feeling that this doesn't actually work Are you referring to endorsing for support/objection (which doesn't seem to be an Agoran decision and so wouldn't be covered by 2127), or do you think there's some bug with 649? Greetings, Ørjan.
DIS: Re: BUS: 'Cause I deserve it
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: I intend do ratify the following document Without Objection: -- The Herald is authorized to award aranea the Patent Title of Champion. I believe tradition is that this doesn't do anything, since the rules have to define a way for the state to persist.
DIS: Re: BUS: 'Cause I deserve it
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Luis Ressel wrote: -- The Herald is authorized to award aranea the Patent Title of Champion. -- Silly idea: That the Herald instead use Rule 649 to award aranea the Patent Title of Unchampioned. Greetings, Ørjan.
